Lithium LiFePO4 vs Lead-Acid cost analysis

Lithium Ion benefits and costs
We take the example of a solar installation for a standalone building (Self Sufficient Home). The storage capacity for the battery is 50KWh.

The application need is summarized in the above table:

SpecificationsValue
Stored Energy50KWh
Cycling frequency1 x discharge/charge per day
Average ambient temperature23°C
Expected Lifespan3000 Cycles, or 8 years

The costs of delivery and installation are calculated on a volume ratio of 6:1 for Lithium system compared to a lead-acid system. This assessment is based on the fact that the lithium-ion has an energy density of 3.5 times Lead-Acid and a discharge rate of 100% compared to 50% for AGM batteries.

Based on the estimated lifetime of the system, the lead-acid battery solution-based must be replaced 5 times after initial installation. Lithium Iron phosphate solution-based is not replaced during operation (3000 cycles are expected from the battery at 100% DoD cycles)

The cost per cycle, measured in € / kWh / Cycle, is the key figure to understand the business model. To calculate it, we consider the sum of the cost of batteries + transportation and installation costs (multiplied by the number of times the battery is replaced during its lifetime). The sum of these costs is divided by the net consumption of the system (50kWh per cycle, 365 cycles per year, 8.2 years of use). The result is summarized in the table below:

Lead-Acid AGMLithium-Ion
Installed capacity100 KWh50 KWh
Usable capacity50 KWh50 KWh
Lifespan500 cycles at 50% DoD (Depth of Discharge)3000 cycles at 100% DoD
Number of installations6 (1 + 5 replacements)1
Battery cost60 000€ (100€/KWh x 100 x 6)25 000€ (500€/KWh x 50 x 1)
Installation cost12 000 € (2000 € per install x 6)2000 € (one shot install)
Transportation cost6 000€ (1 000€ per transport x 6)1 000€ (one shot install)
TOTAL COST78 000€28 000€
Cost per usable KWh per cycle0.42€ / usable kWh (78 000 / 3000 / 50) 0.18€ / usable kWh (28 000 / 3000 / 50)

In summary, the total cost of ownership per usable kWh is about 2.33 times cheaper for a lithium-based solution than for a lead acid solution.

We note that despite the higher facial cost of Lithium technology, the cost per stored and supplied kWh remains much lower than for Lead-Acid technology. The reason is related to the intrinsic qualities of lithium-ion batteries but also linked to lower transportation costs.

This case is valid for any type of application requiring deep discharge cycle. EV traction or autonomous systems match the same criteria. On the other hand, for UPS systems or back-up batteries, the above model can not be applied because the discharge cycles are by definition random for such systems.

This article is the exclusive property of PowerTech Systems.
Reproduction prohibited without permission.

ESS Modular Systems : PowerRack®
Modular batteries for electric traction : PowerModule®
Drop-In AGM Replacement : PowerBrick®
High Starting Power : Powerstart®